The audience of our film is fans of psychological thrillers.Within this niche, we decided that we would be primarily targeting 15-24 year olds. Furthermore, for a secondary audience we wanted to target fans of British independent films.
The prezi presentation below looks into this in greater detail. (Be sure to access it in full screen for better viewing)
My name is Joshua Oranu-Noah and I am a member group 3. I am working alongside Gabriel Meytanis (8560), Ella Thompson (8696) and Prudence Carter-Phillips (8128). I have completed Brief 1: Film. To view my portfolio work, please see the labels on the right hand side below with the names AS Research and Planning, AS Construction and AS evaluation.
Our opening sequence for 'Follow'
Our opening sequence for 'Follow'
The opening sequence for 'Follow'
Monday, 14 March 2016
Evaluation Question 5: How did you attract/address your audience?
Our knowledge of the Uses and Gratifications theory helped us to ensure we successfully attracted and appealed to our target audience of psychological thriller fans. This theory means that consumers of media play an active role in deciding on a media; They do so with the aim of satisfying their specific needs. There are four things that media users aim to fulfill for themselves:
- Personal identity/identification
- Social interaction/personal relationships
- Education
- Entertainment
The table below entails how we applied the Uses and Gratifications theory in our film opening to attract our audience and gratify their needs:
Additionally, to further our appeal to our target audience, we used continuity techniques such as match on actions when editing. These techniques help to increase the realism of our film and the use of closely framed shots in the match on action sequences, helps to immerse them in what is going on. The GIF video below is an example of this in our film opening.
In addition to our use of the Uses and gratifications theory, we also ensured that we successfully appealed to and attracted our audience by conforming to the conventions of the psychological thriller genre that we are trying to connote. By doing this, we are able to also conform to the expectations of our target audience, further appealing to them. One way in which we did this, was through attention to Mise en Scene, such as the props that we used:
- A moodboard that grace used for the stalking of Ella
- A knife and leather gloves that grace packed into her bag
Additionally, to further our appeal to our target audience, we used continuity techniques such as match on actions when editing. These techniques help to increase the realism of our film and the use of closely framed shots in the match on action sequences, helps to immerse them in what is going on. The GIF video below is an example of this in our film opening.
Audience reaction and feedback:
Through the production of our film opening, there were stages where we obtained feedback from members of our target audience. The feedback was very beneficial as it helped us to identify areas of/things in our film opening that worked well and not so well, which we would then use to make any changes or adjustments that we felt necessary. We decided to sample a group of 8 people from our target audience, having equal numbers of both genders in the group that varied in age between the ages of 15 and 24.
During the production process, there were two points at which we gathered feedback from this sample group:
- After the test shoot when we had created a rough cut edit
- After the main and back-up shoots when we had created the final edit
The chart below shows the feedback we received from our sample group for the rough cut edit:
Overall, the reaction we received was not positive, however with that said, the comments that lacked positivity were very useful as they contained lots of criticisms and suggestions which we took into account in the next stages. We few points of criticism that were brought to our attention were:
- "A need for better characterisation. Who is this girl and why is doing what she is doing?"
- "Storyline isn't obvious. What is actually happening?"
- There was no real sense of the plot; It is not clear what is going on. This is likely be down to a poor setting and a weak sense of genre caused by a poor storyline and insufficient props. To rectify this, we decided to look for an alternative shooting location, rethink our whole storyline and ensure all props ready and all brought to the shoot (the moodboard was not prepared).
The same questions were asked to the sample group but this time for the final edit where we were sure to work on areas that the audience (sample group) felt needed work and attention. The chart below shows the feedback from this:
It is clear that there is a difference between the two charts. The feedback for the final edit showed that the changes that were made had a positive effect on the reaction to our film opening. There were no areas of negative feedback and every member of our sample group said that they would go and watch the rest of the film, highlighting the successful appeal that we had created.
Labels:
AS Evaluation
Evaluation Question 6: What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
The construction of our 2 minute opening sequence taught me a lot about technologies. I feel that the skills I have when working with both hardware and software have improved significantly over the process.
In conclusion, I feel that my ability and confidence when working with technical equipment, both hardware and software, has improved. This was especially the case with software, as my biggest technological challenge came when working on the Adobe Premier Pro software to grade shots. After, consulting with my fellow editing partners and the media technician for help, by the end of the process I was able to confidently grade shots to create desired effect and atmosphere. Additionally, I am now aware of the benefits to using certain technologies instead of others.
Hardware
For the construction of our opening sequence, we had use a number of different hardware technologies. This included:
- Camera - Cannon Legria HFG30
- Tripod
The table below details my overall experience after working with hardware.
Software
We also had to use various types of software technologies particularly for the editing process:
- Adobe Premier Pro CS5.5
- LiveType
- Audible
In conclusion, I feel that my ability and confidence when working with technical equipment, both hardware and software, has improved. This was especially the case with software, as my biggest technological challenge came when working on the Adobe Premier Pro software to grade shots. After, consulting with my fellow editing partners and the media technician for help, by the end of the process I was able to confidently grade shots to create desired effect and atmosphere. Additionally, I am now aware of the benefits to using certain technologies instead of others.
Labels:
AS Evaluation
Evaluation Question 7: Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
My preliminary task
Our aim when approaching the Prelim task was to showcase our technical ability through the creation of a sequence that put a lot of emphasis on continuity and camerawork. Having looked back, the prelim task proved to be very important as it allowed for the development of these technical skills. This differed to our approach to the film brief, most likely because the two tasks asked for different things. With our now developed technical skills following the preliminary task, our aim for the film brief was to be as creative as possible through the process as this would allow our product to be more unique and original.
The production task brief - "To produce a 2 minute opening sequence for a fiction film. All video and audio material must be original, produced by the candidate(s), with the exception of music and audio effects from a copyright-free source. It should be clear from your sequence who he target audience is."
The main differences between these two task are:
- The film brief emphasises a need for originality and creativity in task
- Film brief focuses on audience unlike the prelim task brief
- Final product is to be shorter in the prelim task
Pre-production
The planning
processes that we carried out for the prelim task and the film brief were
different in a few ways:
- We created more documents for the film brief such as the re-shoot shot list, the call sheet and the props list
- We held a significantly greater number of group meetings for the film brief
- The preliminary task did not put as much pressure on the groups organisational skills so there was little need for the documents that we created for the film brief
Production
The
production process that each task required was also different:
- The people that were actors in the prelim task were only from our group, unlike the film task where we used one actor that was not a member of our group
- We had a lot more time for the shooting of the film task
- We were only able to shoot in school for the prelim task
- We completed the shooting of the prelim task in two lessons (1hour 20minutes), unlike the two 9am - 5pm weekend main and back-up shooting sessions for the film task
Following
the success of the product for the prelim task, we were sure we could repeat
this in the film task, and even better it by using different locations and
different actors.
Post-production
The
differences in the processes carried out during post-production are as
followed:
- The film task allowed for numerous editing sessions over a 3 week period where as the total editing time for the prelim task was 1 week
- The preliminary task did not require us to add extra effects to the finished edit e.g. grading, titles and/or music and a soundtrack
The skills
learnt in the post-production of our prelim task were transferable, and we were
sure to make use of them in the post-production of our film task. These skills
included things such as organisation, teamwork, decision making and
communication.
Labels:
AS Evaluation
Monday, 7 March 2016
Construction Post 10: Looking back - reflections on our final outcome
I am very happy with the final outcome of our film opening sequence; we successfully constructed film opening through the use of good team work, organisation and effective time management. Although there were a few points in the process where we encountered problems that could have jeopardised the success of our final product, as a group we managed to overcome them and ensure the success of our product. The test shoot was one point in the process that proved difficult; it highlighted how a lack of organisation can cause problems. We managed to overcome this by identifying areas to improve and putting them right for the upcoming main shoot.
Once these issues were sorted out, we were able to advance our product to ensure that it met the terms of our brief; to create a 2 minute film opening sequence for a story and plot of your choice. We showed our final product to our target audience focus group once again and they were not able to pick out any issues in opening sequence, and could confirm that the changes made since their last viewing made for a better final product and viewing pleasure.. This positive feedback epitomised of the success of our final product, and it meant that we had effectively met the brief and done things such as connoting the relevant genre of psychological thriller and conforming to the conventions of films with a similar genre and institutions.
In hindsight, if I were to change anything, I would have ensured that our levels of organisation and team work were sustained throughout the project which would have most definitely avoided the problems faced regarding our storyline, the test shoot and edit sessions. If this change was made, I am sure that our already successful final product would have been more appealing and of a higher quality. This said, I am still very pleased with how our final product turned out and hope that our hard work is reflected in the standard of the product.
Once these issues were sorted out, we were able to advance our product to ensure that it met the terms of our brief; to create a 2 minute film opening sequence for a story and plot of your choice. We showed our final product to our target audience focus group once again and they were not able to pick out any issues in opening sequence, and could confirm that the changes made since their last viewing made for a better final product and viewing pleasure.. This positive feedback epitomised of the success of our final product, and it meant that we had effectively met the brief and done things such as connoting the relevant genre of psychological thriller and conforming to the conventions of films with a similar genre and institutions.
In hindsight, if I were to change anything, I would have ensured that our levels of organisation and team work were sustained throughout the project which would have most definitely avoided the problems faced regarding our storyline, the test shoot and edit sessions. If this change was made, I am sure that our already successful final product would have been more appealing and of a higher quality. This said, I am still very pleased with how our final product turned out and hope that our hard work is reflected in the standard of the product.
Labels:
AS Construction
Construction Post 9: My technical learning curve
I feel that I learnt a lot from this process. Although I was comfortable both editing and working with the camera, as I had not worked with either for a while before this process, I was not as good as I knew I could be. This process helped me to regather my skills and in some cases enhance them, for example in the editing stage I was required to work with new tools such as with key frames. To help me to understand how to use them I googled tutorials and also asked our technician, Emma, to help me understand how to use this tool. This helped to improve my technical skills when editing and allowed to pick up a few skills and tips that I could transfer into the production of our opening sequence. Additionally, this process required me to work with the camera for our shoot sessions. From past experiences of working with the camera, I vaguely remembered how everything worked. Nevertheless, after some time working with the camera, I again quickly regathered my camera skills and in fact furthered them through the help of Emma.
Labels:
AS Construction
Construction Post 8: My personal contribution to the Edit Sessions
Following on from this, there were a few things that Gabriel and I assigned each other to do as we felt that it best suited our expertise, therefore making the editing process more efficient.
Gabriel - creating the final/official titles and grading the shots
Josh (Me) - cutting shots in the sequence to match the soundtrack and editing for special shots such as editing the 3 shot split screen using key frames
Looking back, I am very happy with my contribution to this stage of construction as I feel that I put in as much time and effort as possible, which contributed significantly to the success of our final product.
Labels:
AS Construction
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

